Forrester: Agencies Need to be booted (oops, re-booted)

March 29, 2009

ED NOTE: (oldie but a goldie) …sign of the times when we refer to things approximately 1 year old as oldie. Attention crash is apri pro.

I continually find myself reviewing and looking for a date, is this relevant, what is the context? when and who said it? I still think content is king but without context the value is marginal IMHO.

Anyway, reboot is more like it an I have recently accepted (more like parachuted into) an agency that has gone from being on fire (Nero fiddling kinda of on fire) to “hot” on fire!!… so back to finding the right  mix of acceleration fuel and adult supervision.

P.S. glad to have connected with a Mr. AAron Man; most recently CEO of Relevant Mind (technology platform that translateslistening into influence insight). Not sure he has flown around in a platinum, titanium rocket suit but I still like the IronMANN nickname. Class act and smart. Maybe virginia there is a Santa Claus after all.

Back to re-booting… please keep an eye out for the “new & improved” MarketingWorks Social Marketing Agency, coming to IMAX in a freshly digitally remastered form.

Forrester: Agencies Need to Reboot

Feb 8, 2008

-By Brian Morrissey

NEW YORK Forrester Research believes today’s ad agencies are not well-structured to take on tomorrow’s marketing challenges, needing to move from making messages to establishing community connections.

In a new report, the research firm paints a grim view of the current state of advertising, which it believes is in “a world of hurt” because consumers are tuning out the messages the industry is predicated on producing. Instead, it believes shops need to be organized around communities, not disciplines. What it is calling “the connected agency” would not only know certain communities but also be active members of these groups. Pushing messages would give way to encouraging voluntary engagement, and ongoing conversations would replace time-based campaigns.

“I can’t say there’s an agency now that’s the agency of the future,” said Peter Kim, a Forrester Research analyst and co-author of the report.

The research firm is certainly not the first to assert that agencies haven’t kept up with changing consumer habits and technology. Accenture in November said the shift from analog to digital media is catching shops flat-footed.

In Forrester’s view, a simple fact is driving the need for wrenching change in how advertising agencies are structured: consumers increasingly do not trust marketing messages. Instead, they rely on advice from friends and others in their various communities to make product decisions, while using tech tools to tune out ad messages they deem irrelevant. On top of that, consumer media choice has made the notion of a “captive audience,” other than during some sporting events, a thing of the past.

“I don’t think agencies are going away,” Kim said. “They’re going to be the ones that help marketers to communities of mutual interest.”

He anticipates agencies made up of community members — moms, for instance, helping Procter & Gamble play a constructive role in communities of other mothers.

Since marketers will continue to focus on results from their marketing, particularly as digital media makes it easier to track, advertising agencies would get geekier, Forrester believes.

Despite these changes, Forrester said creative and media agencies are still built around the mass model: to either produce messages or distribute them. Digital agencies have gone farther, in Forrester’s estimation, in centering their businesses around “interaction,” but it finds them lacking in the branding skills of traditional shops.

Clients are finding their agencies wanting. Forrester quotes one marketing exec calling agencies “a necessary evil,” rather than a strategic partner to grow his business. Another complains, “Most senior ad execs appear more comfortable with conventional channels, which they claim are ‘integrated’ because they have tacked on a Web site.”

“The first step [agencies] need to take is with digital integration,” Kim said, adding that the organization of agencies around specific skill sets is the root of their problems.


Stupidity Marketing

March 9, 2009

STUPIDITY

http://blogs.influencer50.com/newsletter/2009/01/lead-generation-is-the-inevitable-end-goal-of-influencer-marketing/

Marketing Directors will still face an increasingly challenging environment in which to deliver ROI.
Having spent time over the years working with many Marketing Directors, I see two different types. In addition to the smart and the not so smart are the ones running ever faster just to stand still, and those aware that just doing more of the same simply isn’t working anymore.
You would think that with the ability to measure everything when you do online marketing, many companies would do so.
Not so say McKinsey consultants – while 91% of the marketing executives who participated in the McKinsey digital-advertising survey (06/08) reported that their companies were advertising online, 80% said that their companies allocate their media budgets by using subjective judgments or by repeating whatever they did the year before.
Amazingly 50% were using click-through rates to measure effectiveness of their online direct response ads. And only 30% considered the offline impact of online marketing.
Surprisingly (not), those who were measuring the impact of online marketing were more satisfied with digital marketing than those who did not, and 55% of them (compared to 43%) were cutting their spending in traditional media in order to increase their spending online.
It is amazing how many marketing departments are still not accountable for results…sigh…
What tends to differentiate them is their collaborative engagement with the key stakeholders from sales and the other key business functions. The always relevant “acid test” questions:
a) How do we sell more?
b) How do we fill the pipeline with quality leads?
c) How do we improve our conversion ratio?
d) How do we accelerate the sales-cycle?
Articulating everything they do in terms of the impact on the top or bottom line value to the business is the leader’s responsibility.
What the smart Marketing Directors do is ask the Sales VP where their best leads have come from in the past. Typically this is not from advertising, nor from direct mail, or events, but where leads have been referred from those movers and shakers in a particular marketplace. These are the people listened to by prospective customers because they’re respected, trusted and usually pretty independent. These leads enter the pipeline in the first place because the sales or business exec has a relationship with one of these influencers, or is in some way networked to them.
This doesn’t happen by accident. Most Sales VPs and CEOs of successful companies intuitively map out those key players who define their marketplace — the people most influential with their customers and potential prospects. They tap into their networks and existing relationships to source quality leads, create awareness and advocacy amongst the people that most matter — in a word, the Influencers.
But nobody’s network is endless and although this will produce significant initial results it will provide diminishing returns over time. Enter the smart Marketing Director who understands this and realizes that broadening and deepening the relationships with the current customers is the best and most effective ROI of all. That’s Influencer Marketing.


Value 2.0 Marketing In A Recession

February 28, 2009

mwks-value-20-brochure_page_11

pages-from-hubspot-marketing-in-a-recession

slide31

slide2

slide4slide5mwks-value-20-brochure_page_31

mwks-value-20-brochure_page_62mwks-value-20-brochure_page_41

mwks-value-20-brochure_page_52

mwks-code-of-ethics-2-pager_page_1mwks-code-of-ethics-2-pager_page_2

slide7

slide6

save

save

save

save


Twittering a New B2B Business Tool

February 27, 2009

Twittering a New b2b Business Tool
Friday, February 13, 2009

Don’t be distracted by the top-line data floating around the Web eco-system today about Twitter’s youth-oriented, social butterfly demographic. There is real business already going on here, especially among b2b publishers.

As the Pew Internet & American Life Project reported yesterday, use of micro-blogging personal update services like Twitter rose noticeably in just the last few months. About 11% of online adults now use these services, up from 9% in November. Clearly, Twitter is a youth-driven phenomenon, with penetration rates of up to 20% in the under-35 demo.

Have you Ever Used Micro-Blog Services?*

19% – 18 to 24-year-olds
20% – 25 to 34-year-olds
10% – 35 to 44-year-olds
5% – 45 – 54-year-olds
4% – 55 – 64-year-olds
2% – 65 and older

* Online adults
Source: Pew Internet and American Life Project

Despite the demographics breakdown, in sheer numbers, the median age of a typical Twitter user is 31, substantially older than the median age of MySpace (27) or Facebook (26) and closer to the professional network LinkedIn (40).

In fact, Twitter is fast becoming an interesting back channel for business media editors. Many b2b publications maintain their own branded Twitter feeds, such as InformationWeek, Financial Times and Wooden Horse, and generally they post links to new stories from their sites. While this is a rudimentary use of Twitter as another RSS-like distribution channel, the strategy does play into the habits of micro-blog readers who can subscribe to these updates. According to Pew, Twitter users employ microblogging as a way to learn about and swap pieces of information, usually in the form of shared links. In other words, much more than a casual channel of personal updates (“Whassup?” and “I am eating falafel”), Twitter is evolving into a valuable social media engine. The typical Twitterite (76%) read newspapers online, compared to 60% of the general Internet population, and 14% read newspaper content on their phones, versus 7% of typical onliners.

More interesting to business information publishers is Twitter’s growing importance as a way to connect with one another and an audience of like-minded professionals. PCMag.com’s Lance Ulanoff frequently queries his “followers” about what they would like to see in new technology. Former PCWorld editor-in-chief and Technologizer blogger Harry McCracken blends the personal and professional. IDG veteran Colin Crawford posts questions and news.

Editors are starting to follow BusinessWeek editor-in-chief John Byrne’s lead and use Twitter as a news and tip-gathering source. As Byrne goes into meetings with top business executives he often queries his followers for questions they would like to ask or he solicits his audience for ideas. “It is, without question, driving a lot more interaction with users,” Byrne tells minonline. “Our writers and editors now have more than 40 Twitter accounts, and they are regularly using Twitter for reporting purposes.” His writers covered the inauguration using Twitter posts from the Washington bureau chief. BusinessWeek.com put a twitter feed onto its main site for users to post ideas on how President Obama should direct the stimulus package.

Byrne also uses Twitter as another place to post links to new stories at BWO. “Twitter is showing up as one of our top referral domains,” he says. “It is still quite low in traffic terms, but the user response has been overwhelmingly good.”

Is your brand or company using Twitter in new and interesting ways? Reply to this blog with your take. Thanks!


Learn Social Media in 1 minute and 12 seconds

February 27, 2009

Top 5 Social Media & Marketing ROI Measures

February 25, 2009

My TOP 5 ROI Measurements – Measuring the Returns of Social Network Marketing

Repost By
by Patrick Courtney

I recently had the opportunity to attend the Online Community Unconference East 2009 at Baruch College here in New York City.  It was my first unconference and I thoroughly enjoyed it.  I met a lot of interesting people and participated in some lively discussions about online communities.  One particular session left me with a lot to think about.  It was a discussion on measuring ROI, and the pursuit to define and standardize quantifiable metrics best suited to measure the return of online community investments.

A participant in this discussion made the following comment at the end of the conference when asked what they learned that day, “I learned a lot about ROI.  I learned that no one knows what ROI is for communities so I get to make up whatever i want.”

As humorous as it was at the time, that comment defines an ever-present struggle of proving the worth of enterprise social networks.  An online community is a living, dynamic strategy that can produce many valuable returns on your investment, not all of which will have direct financial impact.  It’s difficult to quantify (simply) the returns on a strategy with so many moving parts.  While a community initiative might end up being a marketing spend, the returns are cross-departmental, which makes measurement difficult when companies are silo-like in structure.

A few key takeaways emerged from our ROI discussion that I wanted to share:

Define the R -  It’s a good idea to define your goals and the appropriate strategy to achieve them before trying to justify the investment.  There are a lot of shiny new social networking tools and resources that are well suited for achieving business objectives but believe it or not, not all of them are going to work for your business.  Are you shooting for short term financial returns or more long term, value based returns?  Do you intend to build your CRM system, lower support costs, raise brand awareness, increase brand loyalty, glean marketing insights, increase sales, generate word of mouth, all of the above? If you dive in without clearly defining your purpose, you run the risk of botching the execution and potentially causing damage to your brand.

Quantify the R - After you know what you want and what you’re going to do, figure out how you’re going to measure it.  Peter Kim wrote a much talked about post back in December boldly stating that ROI is strictly a financial ratio and if social media marketing can’t be measured by ROI, then there’s no place for social media marketing; a sentiment often echoed by C-level executives.  Others believe the traditional metric of ROI is less applicable because of the complex nature of social media and the return is no longer as clear cut as a direct bottom line impact.  Methodologies such as Net Promoter, ASCI, Engagement Loyalty, ROBI ROCI and ROP, among others, are growing in popularity for measuring returns on social network marketing strategies.

Wait for It…- Online communities take time to produce results.  You’re probably not going to see them on Day 1, and you may not see them on Day 31, but if you have the correct measurement methodologies in place you can be confident that sooner or later that needle will start to move; how well you’ve executed your strategy will determine which way.


Value 2.0

January 21, 2009

What is Value 2.0?

Value 2.0 is Leveraging Social Media To Activate Results

  • More measurable & accountable than traditional media
  • Granular targeting. Reducing waste, improving effectiveness.
  • Empowered consumers demand interactivity and engagement
  • Online media because  increasingly it’s where your customer spends most of their time
  • Allows marketers to reach prospects throughout the entire consumer buying cycle

How to partner up for social media success

January 20, 2009

By Cynthia Francis
Thank you Cynthia….

Struggling to launch a large-scale social media campaign without the necessary staff and resources? Here’s how to smoothly enlist a technology provider to meet your goals and make your client happy.
In today’s economy, uncertainty is the only thing that is certain. Companies are closely watching their bottom line, slashing expenditures and headcounts. But even as budgets shrink, marketers can’t afford to lose market share in a competitive marketplace with an increasing number of businesses gunning for a shrinking pool of consumer dollars. Businesses must find compelling ways to reach customers and differentiate from their competitors. So what’s a marketer to do? Spend smarter. Redirect dollars to initiatives with greater ROI potential and embrace the direction consumers are headed online: social media.

Social media is a catch-all phrase that includes all the ways consumers interact with each other in a media-rich online community, including blogs, forums, video/audio/image sharing, UGC and professional content, video remixes and mash-ups, mobile participation communities, and more. Consumers, who are as affected by the economic crisis as businesses, are now buying smarter and they are using social media to research. They are examining products and company reputations, seeking trusted opinions from family and friends, and contributing their own perspectives to the mix, therefore bypassing traditional sources of brand information.
To remain relevant, marketers need to harness the power of social media networks to enhance and extend their existing marketing campaigns. Brand-sponsored or brand-created social media sights create compelling new avenues for brand loyalty and customer interaction. These communities allow the marketer to communicate clearly, regularly, and honestly with consumers, while at the same time improving the brand identity and creating a level of interest and trust.

According to Coremetrics’ Face of the New Marketer Survey, 78 percent of marketing professionals see social media as a way to gain a competitive edge. However, just 7.75 percent of total online marketing spend is devoted to social marketing. ROI for social media is still developing, and while marketers see the value and want to implement these initiatives, budget and resource concerns reign.
As such, the pressure of developing high-touch, cutting-edge social media campaigns falls on agencies, who must deliver on a budget. Campaigns like these require talent and technology to execute, and in the past agencies were able to meet demands by staffing up in-house tech talent when needed. An interactive social media campaign featuring video remixing and editing would often involve the lead to the agency taking the reins for the customer and providing creative oversight and UI development.

However, developing an initiative like this requires an expertise in the software, a design team, and technology providers for specific site elements. In today’s economy, it simply isn’t feasible to hire incremental staff to support such initiatives. So while the relatively new strategy of social media marketing is largely embraced by consumers, it requires staff expertise that is at a premium today. Most agencies are not internally equipped to launch such initiatives without heavy investments in additional personnel and technology infrastructure.

Enter a new business model: a team approach, where agencies and design shops work in tandem with technology providers to get to market faster and more cost-effectively with less business risk for either party. Software-as-a-service (SaaS) providers offer a unique value proposition to agencies; they own the business risks of developing and maintaining stable software. Agencies are then free to focus on what they do best — building and communicating their client’s brand value — while someone else worries about managing the risk and technical complexity of managing the underlying platform. Successful social media marketing requires an experienced partner with a proven platform. This is a far more efficient and cost-effective approach than trying to build a social media environment from scratch.

To ensure a social media partnership between an agency and technology provider, keep in mind these best practices:

• Co-selling, or at least co-planning, should occur at an early stage in the process.This way, the customer, agency and vendor expectations are effectively set and achieved. To begin with, the agency and social media platform provider should meet and fully demo product capability, creative sensibility, and past work so that both sides are familiar enough to give a good top-level overview. Bringing the technology partner into the first client meeting following the pitch assures that the project is set up appropriately from the beginning.

• Clearly delineate each party’s strengths and limitations.

Tomorrow, Value 2.0


Top 5 2009 Media Predictions NOT, Happen YES, Thank You Yoda

January 10, 2009

2009 – 5 Trends That Will Change Media

Steve_Rosenbaum over at Always on wrote an amazing insightful post which I simply must share.

While some years I’ll post some thoughts about what may or may not happen in the year ahead, this year – the changes are so clear and the drivers so much in place that I’m going to go out on a limb and say what WILL happen in 2009: trends you can bet on.

1. The Growth of the Curation Economy

As the cost of the creation of content continues to come down, more content creators will come online. This will create a huge influx of unfiltered material, and create a significant demand for filters and editors who can find/sort/select and recommend contextual quality content within verticals. This “Curation” function has the potential to give media enterprises whose current business models are under tremendous pressure a new and important role in the web media world. What makes the Curation Economy so powerful, and so disruptive, is that the core resource required to building a high-quality curated experience is not capital, but knowledge. This will drive an emerging class of content entrepreneurs – people who are able to turn their trusted personal brands into high-quality filtered content destinations. As the number of publishers grows dramatically, content consumers will hunger for new trusted sources. These many creators and consumers on the move will fuel whole new businesses and categories.

2. The Emergence of targeted CPA/ CPC as Contextual Content Revenues

The assumption has always been that as more and more users shifted their media consumption habits from print and TV to the web, big brand advertisers would come along and bring their wallets with them. Well, so far that hasn’t been the case. As Bob Garfield wrote in his prescient “Chaos Scenario” http://adage.com/article?article_id=45561, mainstream cash just hasn’t signed on to this whole ‘new media’ thingy. The result has web sites scrambling to invent new revenue sources, subscription fees, or simply close their doors. But wait – not so fast. Consumers ARE spending money on the web. They’re arriving with intent, finding what they want, and swiping a credit card. This means there IS revenue – just not for big broad unfocused ads. So, watch 2009 as the year that Cost Per Action (CPA) and Cost Per Click (CPC) advertising starts to generate real revenues for content sites. And – don’t count out pre-roll video either. One New York based media co is reporting $40 CPM’s for their pre-roll ads, and they aren’t one of the existing cable channels re-purposing content from linear TV to the web world. This is a real magazine co with original content for the web and a $40 CPM. Stay Tuned!

3. The Merging of eCommerce and Content

It used to be that video content (what was then called ‘Television’) was little more than material used to fill in the space around the ads and attract viewers. Ok, that may sound grim, but it’s true. Content was there to draw ‘eyeballs’ so that large groups of people could be sold stuff. Yikes! That doesn’t sound very nice. Well, a few things have changed. While this Holiday Season was the worse ever for retail, Amazon posted the best sales in their history. Really. So, how did that happen? Well it seems folks who knew what they wanted went to Amazon and searched, and then compared prices, and purchased. This idea of intent driving commerce, rather than advertising creating a ‘demand’ for a particular brand or product, is turning Madison Avenue on its head. But, at the same time – there is some evidence that ecommerce and content are about to switch roles. Sites like Thwoop.com have created children’s destinations with free content, and given themselves a first crack at any purchases that the visitors might want to make. The idea that watching content is expressing ‘intent’ is both novel and explosive. My son likes Ben10, so he watches it on Thwoop.com, and then – well, he asks about buying a Ben10 lunchbox, or shirt, or dvd, or something. Content drives Commerce. Expect to see AmazonTV, EBayTV, LLBeanTV and tons more content channels from ecommerce biggies in 2009.

4. Digital Goods – Consumers begin to pay for content

Digital Goods is a broad concept for anything delivered in code. Music, eBooks, iPhone apps, photos – the list goes on and on. While we’ve seen the idea of ’shareware’ on so many little bits of code for so long, the fact is that 2009 will be the year that Digital Goods will take off. Already the numbers from the iTunes store sales are dramatic – almost a million dollars a day in sale of iPhone Apps. That’s huge. Sure, folks look at the free apps first – but it becomes clear quickly that a few dollars can often get you a much better product. Apple has created a safe, trusted micro-payment economy around iTunes and the fact that only software that is tested gets into their iTunes systems is evidence that the Curation Economy is at play here too. But in 2009 you’ll see more video series, ebooks, photo collections, memberships, and subscriptions gain a foothold. There’s some real world reasons for this – web based digital goods are a better value than their real world counterparts in many cases. And other than the legacy of the physical experience (the paper of The New York Times, the Album Covers of old records, the binding of books) the reality is that digital delivery is better for the planet, and has both the long-tail efficiencies and creative freedom that gives digital creators the ability to lower costs (and therefore price). Middlemen who don’t add value should beware, Digital Goods delivery doesn’t require both a wholesale and a retail seller.

5. Cottage Media Takes Off

Media is a good word. It gets confused with journalism and other more narrow words – but used properly it’s a big tent that includes digital content in all its forms. Historically, Cottage Industries have been small mom and pop operations that run out of someone’s home office. And already we can see the emergence of a number of new voices and sources that are essentially ‘Cottage’ operations. More of the brand name content creators we know and enjoy reading/watching are building their own brands while they remain employed by their big media publishers. In 2009 this will change. While advertising may not be jumping into pure UGC anytime soon, the idea of trusted content brands moving to self-publishing is likely to cause quite a stir. Om Malik was one of the first to make the move – though his operation is clearly much larger than a ‘cottage’ it’s a whole lot smaller than his previous home at Forbes – his network of blogs has already become influential and respected. He’s hardly alone in this regard. Fred Wilson (avc.com) Chris Brogan (http://www.chrisbrogan.com), Michael Arrington (Techcrunch.com) Howard Lindzon (http://www.howardlindzon.com) are all building “Cottage” media businesses, some with a journalism focus, others simply blogging a point of view or to built community or conversation.

2009 will be a year of gut wrenching, dramatic, roller-coast change. Big things will get smaller, or die. Little things will survive and start to grow. Consumers will become creators. Lurkers will become participants. The volume of voices will expand exponentially – and the need for clarity and trusted filters will go from being useful to being essential. Just as MP3s turned the music industry on its ear, and Craigslist turned newspapers upside-down, the emergence of personal publishing and new forms of both trusted and Community Curation will have an immediate and long-lasting impact on media, commerce, community and politics.

2009 will be a year of change. And change is, by its nature, full of surprises. Stay flexible. Stay curious. What’s being constructed is a global knowledge eco-system that has world changing implications… for the better.

Posted by Steve Rosenbaum at Dec 30, 08 08:39 AM


January 6, 2009

The Secrets of Marketing in a Web 2.0 World

Consumers are flocking to blogs, social-networking sites and virtual worlds. And they are leaving a lot of marketers behind.

For marketers, Web 2.0 offers a remarkable new opportunity to engage consumers.

If only they knew how to do it.

That’s where this article aims to help. We interviewed more than 30 executives and managers in both large and small organizations that are at the forefront of experimenting with Web 2.0 tools. From those conversations and further research, we identified a set of emerging principles for marketing.

The Journal Report

See the complete Business Insight report.

Join the Discussion

What potential marketing opportunities do Web 2.0 applications and tools offer your company? Which Web 2.0 tools have worked well for your company, and which were less successful? Share your thoughts in an online forum with Bruce Weinberg and Salvatore Parise.

But first, a more basic question: What is Web 2.0, anyway? Essentially, it encompasses the set of tools that allow people to build social and business connections, share information and collaborate on projects online. That includes blogs, wikis, social-networking sites and other online communities, and virtual worlds.

Millions of people have become familiar with these tools through sites like Facebook, Wikipedia and Second Life, or by writing their own blogs. And a growing number of marketers are using Web 2.0 tools to collaborate with consumers on product development, service enhancement and promotion. But most companies still don’t appear to be well versed in this area.

So here’s a look at the principles we arrived at — and how marketers can use them to get the best results.

Don’t just talk at consumers — work with them throughout the marketing process.

Recovering From Negative Reviews

A Web site can be a marketer’s lifeline with its customers, but what happens when it’s marred with negative reviews and comments? Bruce Weinberg, marketing professor at Bentley University, tells WSJ’s Erin White how to address and recover from poor feedback.

Web 2.0 tools can be used to do what traditional advertising does: persuade consumers to buy a company’s products or services. An executive can write a blog, for instance, that regularly talks up the company’s goods. But that kind of approach misses the point of 2.0. Instead, companies should use these tools to get the consumers involved, inviting them to participate in marketing-related activities from product development to feedback to customer service.

How can you do that? A leading greeting-card and gift company that we spoke with is one of many that have set up an online community — a site where it can talk to consumers and the consumers can talk to each other. The company solicits opinions on various aspects of greeting-card design and on ideas for gifts and their pricing. It also asks the consumers to talk about their lifestyles and even upload photos of themselves, so that it can better understand its market.

A marketing manager at the company says that, as a way to obtain consumer feedback and ideas for product development, the online community is much faster and cheaper than the traditional focus groups and surveys used in the past. The conversations consumers have with each other, he adds, result in “some of the most interesting insights,” including gift ideas for specific occasions, such as a college graduation, and the prices consumers are willing to pay for different gifts.

Similarly, a large technology company uses several Web 2.0 tools to improve collaboration with both its business partners and consumers. Among other things, company employees have created wikis — Web sites that allow users to add, delete and edit content — to list answers to frequently asked questions about each product, and consumers have added significant contributions. For instance, within days of the release of a new piece of software by the company, consumers spotted a problem with it and posted a way for users to deal with it. They later proposed a way to fix the problem, which the company adopted. Having those solutions available so quickly showed customers that the company was on top of problems with its products.

Business Insight] Peter & Maria Hoey

Give consumers a reason to participate.

Consumers have to have some incentive to share their thoughts, opinions and experiences on a company Web site.

One lure is to make sure consumers can use the online community to network among themselves on topics of their own choosing. That way the site isn’t all about the company, it’s also about them. For instance, a toy company that created a community of hundreds of mothers to solicit their opinions and ideas on toys also enables them to write their own blogs on the site, a feature that many use to discuss family issues.

Other companies provide more-direct incentives: cash rewards or products, some of which are available only to members of the online community. Still others offer consumers peer recognition by awarding points each time they post comments, answer questions or contribute to a wiki entry. Such recognition not only encourages participation, but also has the benefit of allowing both the company and the other members of the community to identify experts on various topics.

Many companies told us that a moderator plays a critical role in keeping conversations going, highlighting information that’s important to a discussion and maintaining order. That’s important because consumers are likely to drift away if conversations peter out or if they feel that their voices are lost in a chaotic flood of comments. The moderator can also see to it that consumer input is seen and responded to by the right people within the company.

Getting Sociable

  • A New Approach: Marketing these days is more about building a two-way relationship with consumers. Web 2.0 tools are a powerful way to do that.
  • The Pioneers: A growing number of companies are learning how to collaborate with consumers online on product development, service enhancement and promotion.
  • The Lessons: From these early efforts, a set of marketing principles have emerged. Among them: get consumers involved in all aspects of marketing, listen to and join the online conversation about your products outside your site, and give the consumers you work with plenty of leeway to express their opinions.

And, of course, it’s important to make a site as easy to use as possible. For instance, there should be clear, simple instructions for consumers to set up a blog or contribute to a wiki.

Listen to — and join — the conversation outside your site.

Consumers tend to trust one another’s opinions more than a company’s marketing pitch. And there is no shortage of opinions online.

The managers we interviewed accept that this type of content is here to stay and are aware of its potential impact — positive or negative — on consumers’ buying decisions. So they monitor relevant online conversations among consumers and, when appropriate, look for opportunities to inject themselves into a conversation or initiate a potential collaboration.

For example, a marketing manager of a leading consumer-electronics company monitors blogs immediately after a new-product launch in order to understand “how customers are actually reacting to the product.” Other managers keep an eye on sites like Digg.com and Del.icio.us that track the most popular topics on the Web, to see if there’s any buzz around their new products, and whether they should be adjusting, say, features or prices.

In one case, a company found a popular blogger who had spoken highly of the company’s brand. Just prior to launching a new product, the company sent the blogger a free sample, inviting him to review it with no strings attached. The end result: The blogger wrote a favorable review and generated a flood of comments. So the company got nearly free publicity and feedback.

Business Insight] Peter & Maria Hoey

Resist the temptation to sell, sell, sell.

Many marketers have been trained to bludgeon consumers with advertising — to sell, sell, sell anytime and anywhere consumers can be found. In an online community, it pays to resist that temptation.

When consumers are invited to participate in online communities, they expect marketers to listen and to consider their ideas. They don’t want to feel like they’re simply a captive audience for advertising, and if they do they’re likely to abandon the community.

The head of consumer research for a leading consumer-electronics organization created an online community of nearly 50,000 consumers to discuss product-development and marketing issues. One of the key principles of the community, she says, was “not to do anything about marketing, because we weren’t about selling; we were about conversing.”

In short order, community members not only identified what it was they were looking for in the company’s products, but also suggested innovations to satisfy those needs. The company quickly developed prototypes based on those suggestions, and got an enthusiastic response: Community members asked when they would be able to buy the products and if they would get the first opportunity to buy them. They didn’t have to be sold on anything.

Don’t control, let it go.

In an online community, every company needs to find an effective balance between trying to steer the conversation about its products and allowing the conversation to flow freely. In general, though, the managers we interviewed believe that companies are better off giving consumers the opportunity to say whatever is on their minds, positive or negative. Moderators can keep things running smoothly and coherently, but they shouldn’t always keep the conversation on a predetermined track. The more that consumers talk freely, the more a company can learn about how it can improve its products and its marketing.

For Further Reading

See these related articles from MIT Sloan Management Review.

  • Harnessing the Power of the Oh-So-Social Web

By Josh Bernoff and Charlene Li (Spring 2008)
The authors develop a strategic framework that businesses can use to implement social applications in a number of departments, including research and development, marketing, sales, customer support and operations.
http://sloanreview.mit.edu/smr/issue/2008/spring/01/

  • Enterprise 2.0: The Dawn of Emergent Collaboration

By Andrew P. McAfee (Spring 2006)
There is a new wave of business communication tools including blogs, wikis and group messaging software that allow for more spontaneous, knowledge-based collaboration.
http://sloanreview.mit.edu/smr/issue/2006/spring/06/

  • Beyond Enterprise 2.0

By Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee (Spring 2007)
The authors explore the complementary relationship between traditional managerial tools and the evolving modes of collaboration and communication, such as wikis.
http://sloanreview.mit.edu/smr/issue/2007/spring/16/

  • Systems Marketing for the Information Age

By John G. Singer (Fall 2006)
The authors suggest that companies must take a marketing ecosystems view, which shifts away from the logic of “brand” as the primary unit for business strategy.
http://sloanreview.mit.edu/smr/issue/2006/fall/18/

  • How to Market to Generation M(obile)

By Fareena Sultan and Andrew J. Rohm (Summer 2008)
The mobile platform provides the perfect mechanism for reaching young consumers.
http://sloanreview.mit.edu/smr/issue/2008/summer/12/

One marketing executive recalled the first time she let an online community created for a client interact with very little control or moderation, resulting in an animated discussion about the look of the company’s product. The client, with great concern, asked. “Who told them [the consumers] they could do this, that they could go this far?” Of course, when this process resulted in totally new packaging that helped boost sales, the client was ecstatic.

As another executive of a company that creates online communities for clients told us: “You have to let the members drive. When community members feel controlled, told how to respond and how to act, the community shuts down.”

Find a ‘marketing technopologist.’

So who should direct a company’s forays into Web 2.0 marketing? A number of managers identified an ideal set of skills for an executive that go beyond those of a typical M.B.A. holder or tech expert. We coined the term marketing technopologist for a person who brings together strengths in marketing, technology and social interaction. A manager said, “I’d want to see someone with the usual M.B.A. consultant’s background, strong interest in psychology and sociology, and good social-networking skills throughout the organization.”

Foot soldiers need to be carefully selected as well. One large technology company weighs employees’ proven skills to choose writers for blogs that are read by consumers. The company has long used blogs internally to help employees discuss technical issues, products, and company and industry topics. When it decided to use blogs to raise its profile online, it recruited those who had shown the most skill at blogging within the company. The company currently has about 15 employees who blog publicly, mostly on technology trends, and is recruiting more the same way. Meanwhile, the bloggers plan to meet occasionally to share the lessons learned from their experiences.

Embrace experimentation.

One Web 2.0 strategy does not fit all, and sometimes the best way to find out what’s best for a given company is to try some things out and see what happens.

Blogs, wikis and online communities are among the tools that companies are most commonly using for marketing, but there are other ways to reach consumers. Some of the companies we talked with have gotten their feet wet in the online virtual world Second Life, where millions of users interact with each other through avatars. Companies can sell their goods and services and sponsor events in Second Life just as they do in the real world; one sponsored a contest for the best avatar.

Others are considering new ways to use more-familiar tools. For instance, many companies have long used instant messaging on their Web sites to allow shoppers to chat with customer-service representatives. One executive we spoke with said he would like to experiment with allowing consumers to chat with each other as they shop on his company’s site.

—Dr. Parise is an assistant professor of technology, operations and information management at Babson College in Wellesley, Mass. Dr. Guinan is an associate professor of technology, operations and information management at Babson College. Dr. Weinberg is chairman of the marketing department and an associate professor of marketing and e-commerce at Bentley University in Waltham, Mass. They can be reached at reports@wsj.com.